meet the vigilantes
the dollar vigilante blog
Don't Worry About Buying Local

Share this article on:
[Editor’s Note: The following piece is by TDV Editor, Gary Gibson]
Like every well-adjusted human being, I love getting stuff. I love being able to shell out the money I've won or earned and participate in the market system that keeps producing all sorts of goodies that constantly improve the quality of material life.
And now the time of year has rolled around when buying stuff becomes something between sport, spectacle, and duty. Whether religious or not, the holidays are outright magical, especially in those climates that spawned the reverent observance of winter and the cold, dark part of the life cycle in the first place. The much (and stupidly) maligned commercial aspect of Christmas can be seen as the struggle to make life comfortable even when the reminders of life's ultimate nature and ultimate results are closest.
It's the marriage of the sacred with material acquisition. And as usual you can count on the politicians and their economically muddle-minded enablers to kill the buzz. A few days ago The Daily Caller reported on a little free market-killing line added to the endlessly annoying annual National Defense Authorization Act which would seek to add a sales tax to online sales. That's annoying enough. But it's the federal government and economic illiteracy should be as expected as spectacular hypocrisy and violence. What caught my eye and my ire was this passage:
“...A recent poll indicates that the majority of Americans support the idea, describing an online sales tax as 'common sense'. They also feel that a tax for online purchases would encourage people to buy local and keep tax dollars in their community.
“'Local retailers invest in their communities and play a significant role in the overall quality of life in the places we call home,' said Betsy Laird, senior vice president of global public policy for the International Council of Shopping Centers.”
Jiminy Christmas, I am sick of this “buy local” nonsense. And I am sick of how incredibly economically illiterate and pro-tax Americans can be.
First of all, let's dispense with the obvious. This tax, like all taxes, would be an attempt to influence behavior, to force people to make economic decisions that create winners not decided by the market but by government policy. This tax, like all taxes, is theft with the intention of politically influencing an outcome instead of letting individuals (the market) sort out the winners and losers.
But in this particular case, the tax is an attempt to eliminate one of the great powers of the Internet. The Internet has allowed people to make connections that transcend the old models and the state itself with its usual confiscations.
The “buy local” stuff is a fallacy born of short-sightedness and midwifed by a gullibility for trite phrases like “buy American” and “support our troops”. First let's look at the argument taken to the absurd levels. Why limit economic transactions to within a certain arbitrary perimeter, like the nation-state or the township? Imagine if your local car dealer only “bought local”, if he refused to buy a car whose materials weren't mined in town, whose parts weren't crafted and put together in the local factory. Same goes for your grocer. What if he only ever bought animal meat or milk or produce from farmers within 10 miles of his shop, even if buying from another 10 miles out allowed him to provide similar quality for lower prices? Or maybe the “buy local” people and the politicians would be okay if the materials gathered where in the same county, or state, or country? Where does it stop? How many economic bad decisions have to be made to satisfy the arbitrary notion of local-ness? How much higher pricing do we put up with? And what counts as “local”, anyway? What the politicians or your dumb neighbors decide. Why not let the individual consumer decide where and with whom he should spend his money?
There is room for the local merchant alongside the online one. And turns out neither your neighbors nor local or federal government has to get involved. It comes down to basic economic factors of consumer choice and time preference. Left to his own devices, your local merchant stocks the kinds of things he calculates local folks will want immediately at the quantity and price that will attract enough business to make him a profit. He won't stock those items that people would rather buy online at lower prices and for which they don't mind waiting for shipping. The online merchant is just another competitor in a sea of competitors and it requires no special legislation to deal with. Just the usual business sense. The consumers and the merchants can work it out themselves. Some things make less sense to buy at the store in the age of the Internet merchant. There's nothing to fix here. The market adjusts itself.
Does this mean that there may be smaller and fewer Main Street businesses? Maybe. But this needn't be a bad thing! People apparently eat up the tear-jerking primetime drama of the mom-and-pop going out of business because some corporate chain moves in. But those evil chains provide good jobs and benefits to hundreds and thousands of other people. They also serve their customers with obscenely large selections and lower prices. Thanks to the mom-and-pop-killing chain, consumers in a given community are left with more money to spend on other things, like physically improving their local surroundings. Mom-and-pop can stop overcharging their customers for a limited selection and instead contribute their labor to something that serves everyone better. Maybe they can get a job with benefits at the new corporate chain.
We must remember that no form of business is sacred and impermanent. And we should be glad about that! Thank god refrigeration has transformed the open air market. Thank heaven for climate-controlled centralized indoor shopping in the dead of winter and heart of summer. And we should be glad that certain businesses are no longer needed and have died – like the ice delivery man who provided ice for the ice box, or the urban horse carcass-removal service. And we shouldn't mourn as certain businesses contract and die. It's a part of the process as the technology and the markets lift our lives to higher levels of convenience, efficiency and affordability.
A perfect example is the physical bookstore. Nostalgic people who are also economically illiterate weep at the idea that the brick and mortar bookstore will become a thing of the past. Congressman and dunderhead Jesse Jackson Jr. made quite the stink last year about this very thing when he blamed the e-readers for killing brick and mortar bookstores. You can download just about any book into your PC or electronic reader, or if you still like the touch and feel of physical books, you can order the physical version online and usually for cheaper than the bookstore downtown will have it. Plus, it will be delivered right to your door.
But there will still be a market for people who want to go downtown and get their books immediately instead of waiting for them to ship. Just as there will be a market for people who rather rummage around a bookstore than shop online. No need to create choice-altering tax policy to punish evolution. People will act according to their innate preferences and the market will adjust the supply of brick and mortar bookstores accordingly. To try to force the outcome would be as outrageously stupid as providing tax breaks to horse-riders over car-drivers to satisfy some romantic notion that cities full of horses are horse-drawn carriages are what everyone would or “should” prefer.
It's a matter of letting the market be free to do its thing, which is an economist's way of saying let people make their own choices with their money without the political pressure of prohibition or sales taxes...let things shake out as they will in response to consumer demand. That doesn't mean corporations buying regulatory favors from the state to reduce competition. It merely means letting people choose what's best for them in their own estimation.
Quite simply, maybe it's time for there to be fewer mom-and-pop shops.
Look around your house right now. Look in your garage. Look in your refrigerator. Ask yourself how much poorer your life would be if you could only buy things bought locally. Perhaps there are some things that honestly make more sense for you to go to a store and buy locally, but wouldn't you rather figure out what those are for yourself than have your neighbors and their political hacks decide for you? Why on earth would you support taxation that funneled your money toward businesses that don't serve you as well as others could? Are you counting on those businesses recycling your money into a civic tax base? Without getting too dogmatic and preachy about voluntary funding as opposed to taxation, let me just point out that the hope of recycled tax money is the hope of un-guaranteed positive outcomes arising from theft. You might be a lot better off paying for local improvements with a pool of like-minded neighbors than sending the money to city hall and hoping for the best.
Makes me wonder what are they going to say as 3D printing vastly reduces then eliminates the need for centralized manufacturing? Are they going to tax 3D printing so as to make buying from manufacturers more attractive and thus save unnecessary manufacturing jobs? Actually, yeah, they probably will.
In any case, enjoy the Shopping Season to the fullest and enjoy the tax-free nature of it all while you may. This may be the last Christmas you can do so until the inevitable collapse of the inefficient and ever-violent state.
And by the way, just as your purchasing dollars shouldn't “stay local”, neither should your purchasing power. It's up to you to keep your purchasing power protected from malicious politicians and your numbskull fellow citizens as possible. TDV can help by getting your money into cozy and safe offshore accounts. Click here to learn more.
Regards
Gary Gibson
Share this article on:














Comments (17)
Totally wrong advice in many of these posts.
First of all, what you do doesn't matter. The mad crowds are going to get their way no matter what you do. So, don't be so incredibly stupid as to support local. Save you money first by shopping at Wall mart, then, if and when Wallmart "pulls-out", you will actually have the money to shop local, unlike all the supporters.
Thus the rule: Ignore what you should do politically, only mind your pocket. This has nothing to do with your ideals and whay would you actually prefer to see.
Second, the only way for Walmart to close the M&P store is to offer lower pricing and or higher quality. Better put it like this " they have to offer better pricing per unit of quality". So, if all of you up there on Kodiak continued to shop local, then the Wallmart would have failde. Please, don't tell me the tear-filled stories about crony-capitalism, while you yourself benefitting from crony-communism. I can't kill and sell local wildlife the same as is allowed to you. The way I see it you are no different than Wallmart in that regard.
So, for the mom&pop store to fail, someone had to go shopping in Wallmart, and first of all it was you, and probably for a good reason.
I find that in general, the locals are nasty nasty. The reason they need "support" is that they are taking in more than the competition, and they want to tell me to support their lifestyle. If you don't like crony capitalism then get this idea out of your head, of supporting. "Cronyism" is just the other side of "support", no different than the "price" is the other side of "wage". Stop acting politically, because this acting is the very reason everything is so f-d up. Corporations are currently supported by the government. You want locals to be supported? Possible. Governments don't care who to support. How come? Because it is not who you support, it is the fact of support being controlled by you that makes you rich.
Ok? Just mind your own business, without destroying or supporting anyone.
Mava, sometimes I want to kiss you.
The reality is that regardless of any buy-local campaign, any group of people must produce more than they consume. Ultimately, what you want to promote is 'produce local'. If a community doesn't produce more than it consumes then it will die.
So why is it so expensive to produce local? Taxes, regulations, min wage laws, etc.
The USA trade deficit tells you that on average people are consuming more than they are producing and that if governments continue to hinder local production we will one day go without.
So buying local is effectively refusing to give large companies the benefit they gained by crony-capitalism. You pay a higher price locally, only because the non-local product is subsidized by tax dollars.
Perhaps more important than the 'location' of the company you are doing business with, is the scale of the company. Boycot any company that uses crony-capitialism to win even if it means paying a higher price. Don't shop at the big chain stores because supporting those stores supports crony capitalism. Crony capitialism works because it is 'profitable' and the market follows the lowest price with little regard for what acts of theft or violence enabled that lower price. If you want to see change you need to not base your actions solely on cash price but also on moral price. Clearly you wouldn't shop at a store known for selling stolen goods even if it was the 'best price in town'.
Ultimately, the act of boycotting crony capitalism equates to 'buying local' even if the 'local' shop you are buying from is 3000 miles away via Bitcoin.
Ah... but you are still living in a Currency centric world.
You gotta go local for barter.
You can be part of the soluton or part of the problem.
Currency is just a tool to facilitate barter. Nobody says it has to be meaningless pieces of paper issued by the governmafia. It could just as easily be gold, silver, or if you need something convenient for online transactions while remaining under the radar, try Bitcoin.
I'll be the first here to admit though that I've never used Bitcoin although I've looked into it. The main reason being just that I have yet to find any real benefit to it in my own life.
Mom and Pop stores, in their advent, and in there time of origin, were the same as our modern day 'Walmarts'.
With the growing introduction of the automobile, people no longer had to live in an urban setting where access to business was concentrated in a small area and so easily accessible to them. With the automobile, people were given access to easy travel and suburbia grew and so the Mom and Pop stores came into existence; Mom and Pop stores were convenient because people didn't have to go far to pick up a few things they needed. People no longer had to depend upon an business in an urban area for everything.
Also, Mom and Pop stores, were like modern day Walmarts as they were most likely built on farmland which people, at that time, just as likely nostalgically lamented losing. Or Mom and Pop stores sprang up under a shady tree that, people likely lamented, they used to play and climb on as a child.
Why would anyone complain about a business, like Walmart, that provides the needs of the Marketplace? When Walmart stops offering what people need, they will disappear (unless artificially kept alive by tax subsidies)
Gary:
I'm a copy editor by trade so I have "no choice" but to find typos.
From seventh graf:
"How many economic bad decision have to be made to satisfy the arbitrary notion of local-ness?"
Strike "decision" and place "decisions."
Cheers, Argus
Dana and the rest of you make the excellent point that it's not exactly the fair free-for-all of a real free market. Who knows how "local" anything would be if there were no cronyism or taxation.
In the absence of that, however, I still stand against this neo-liberal localism. It's medieval in its small-mindedness and economic idiocy. It's no better than the "buy American" crap that the isolationists put forward. It's just a more localized version.
Most definitely it's just another artificially created loyalty to give people some illusion that they have some control of the matter, and yet another excuse to put up more trade barriers which ultimately will only make the situation worse, not better.
Personally my loyalties lie with those that provide me quality products at good prices, which is why I tend to by a lot of things online, and frequently by direct from companies in Hong Kong or China where I can save 80-90% and not have to pay sales taxes. In fact even buying within the US, I intentionally buy for out of state companies to avoid sales tax. Why should I buy local if it's going to cost me an extra ~9%.
Check out "The Locavore's Dilemma" by Pierre Desrochers. He smashes many of the myths promulgated by the local food movement. It's basically about economic isolationism, and just as impractical.
I agree. I wouldn't condemn a large chain of stores competing honestly in a free market, but again we don't have a free market. We have crony capitalism (fascism). It's the lack of a free market that allows these montrosities to grow out of control to the point where are choices become fewer and fewer. In a free market we should have many many more choices of goods and services and many more choices of where and how we can transact our business.
One thing i never hear brought up is that the reason we are buying out products from faraway places isn't because we have a free market, but mainly because we don't. It's the market distortions created by borders, trade restrictions, regulations and corporate cronyism that make it more economically attractive to ship something (requiring more human resources and effort) than to buy something that was made locally. In a world without borders where people and gods could move about freely the playing field would most certainly level off as those distortions disappeared, and while the technology to transport good around the world would still exist the additional costs would make local good more competitive.
I agree with what Moondeer said on the free market's glaring absence in the world we live in today. Markets today are rigged and manipulated by a few large entities. They rarely send the proper price signals that free markets are expected to do. There's little point in talking about an ideal situation where free markets reign when they have been gone for a good three or four decades.
Buying local goods and local services goes beyond the issues of prices and selections. For one, it's been scientifically proven (and known for thousands of generations) that locally grown food has a more appropriate combination of nutrients for that particular region. A good cure for certain allergies is local honey. Nature has set it up so one doesn't have to travel far to find what one needs. The corollary is one might not be getting what one needs if pricing and selection choice on a supermarket's shelves are more important criteria.
Localism is an essential part of resilience, even at the individual level. You can't phone in an order from across the country when there's a natural disaster and the roads are destroyed. You have to rely on the neighborhood farm. Localism is a key ingredient of the decentralized world of the future.
Don't get me wrong. There's a lot of wisdom in what TDV says but sometimes I do get surprised by certain extreme views.
When 3 D printers first came out I wandered over to the local manufacturing place and explained the technology. Explained how prefitting scale components in CAD would be an effective troubleshooter and great 3D promotional tool. Also gave them information on how the government would fund, supply machines and start a training program at the Local University if a business could show an innovative use for it. The reason I gave the idea to a local was because they were having real problems keeping local employees working year round.
So... Fast Forward a few years later, I had a few more ideas and stopped in again.
The local uni had the machine in place and taught a course... But instead of hiring a graduate, they hired the teacher as a consultant a couple of hours a week.
He input the Cad specifics into the program and they emailed the data to China to have them build for the Australian market.
So the Head office was showing healthy profits and happy shareholders while the local guys were working fewer hours than ever.
A year or so later, the Chinese cut them out and were selling the units and the molds globally.
I am waiting for the closing auction.
There is no such thing as a FREE market. What we have now is a parasitic system that pumps out illusory items of value.
Who needs 90% of all this crap? Regardless of where it is made?
As soon as people figure this out... watch ALL manufacturing, shipping, trade, currency go dark.
All that will be left is local. If you don't invest in keeping them feeding their kids now?
They will not be around to feed YOU later.
Look at Finviz, realize that if you add shipping to Food, People are going to starve in the G7s, never mind the rest of the globe.
Go to a grocery store, understand what Soybean feed increases of 52% in the last year will do.
Inflation in an exponential curve is already here in food... checking watch... NOW.
http://finviz.com/futures_performance.ashx?v=16
History shows us that when that hapens, shipping time divided by currency depreciation makes trade impossible.
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2012...
Buy local.
Jeff
Just missed you at the silver summit and it appears I just missed you in the DR with Barry.
Anyway, I agree with about 90% of the article. Here is where I digress.
I live in a small town in Alaska called Kodiak. We had a Wal-Mart move in to town in 2001. They put at least 8 or 9 local businesses out of business and that was just the first year, I’m sure more businesses have closed since because of them. My problem is that if it truly was a free market then it would be fine. However, it’s not a free market. Wal-Mart got preferential treatment with the borough assembly members of Kodiak who are as corrupt as any politicians anywhere else. So we are talking about crony capitalism or fascism or whatever you want to call it. This is not fair to the mom and pop shop. Mom and Pop can’t afford to pay off the local whores, so they loose. When you make sweeping statements about the free market (which I completely agree with) you must make the distinction that you are indeed talking about a “FREE” market not a corrupt crony market.
My other point is that when the dollar collapses Wal-Mart will more than likely pull out of town and leave us with no other sources to get what they offer. This is going to happen in most small towns but it is the worst here in Kodiak as we are an Island. We can’t drive to another town to get what we need.
Anyway, that’s my 2 bits.
Maybe see you sometime in the DR.
Jamie Fagan
Wild Alaska Smoked Salmon
www.smoked-fish.com
1-888-945-3533
1-907-486-6772
jamie@smoked-fish.com
PO Box 2140
Kodiak, AK 99615
I feel we lose diversity whenever we support the big-chain stores like Walmart - which I understand everyone has a choice... but some people don't seem to look at the future impact of their decisions. Tis life, I suppose. Everywhere will eventually look like everywhere...
I was just on a cute Main Street on the St. Croix River over in Wisconsin yesterday. Quaint Main Streets all look pretty much alike, too, yet I don't hear anyone complaining that they all look the same. Like my old friend Jim Kunstler pointed out, it's not that things look "the same"; it's that we either like or don't like what we see there. No one complains about all Mediterranean hillside towns "looking the same" because it's what Jim called a uniformity of excellence.
Personally, I love seeing small business bars and eateries mixed in with Targets and Walgreens on a Main Street. The chains will tend to win out in the goods and sundries markets, but people still seem to prefer small business bar and grills. My advice remains to let the market (individual choice) sort out which businesses thrive and quit trying to get people to support something because you happen to find it endearing or romantic.
Post new comment