the dollar vigilante blog

Police Stops in the First World vs. the Third World

[Editor’s Note: The following post is by Mexican-based TDV Education Correspondent, Jorge Gato]

I have been stopped by the police for minor infractions and for no legitimate reason on numerous occasions in the USSA, the Balkans, and Mexico. Perspective is vital when doing a cost/benefit analysis of police encounters.

An indoctrinated American statist might say something to the tune of, "well, at least we're more civilized and safer with the rule of law!"

To which I might reply "you are correct, now el presidente may legally and safely put you in jail forever without cause and assassinate you, making life secure for everyone!"

Life in a foreign country has advantages and disadvantages. In Mexico, I really miss deep dish pizza, but I now enjoy real tacos which are unlike anything a Taco Bell customer will ever see in their life. I once unwittingly ordered and ate brain tacos. In Mexico, I also miss out on "safe" fluoridated water. Wait, nevermind, that's actually an advantage!

My permanent tourist gauge is the balance of freedom and personal safety. The USSA used to honor this principle of maximum freedom and personal safety by pretty much allowing people to do what they wanted and only making sure people weren't killing each other or stealing the hard-earned wealth of their neighbor.

Not only does the USSA not ensure personal safety anymore, but it actually helps your neighbors steal from you! What used to be the case was you were allowed to defend yourself by force from someone entering your home. Heck, even the Old Testament says that: "if a thief is found breaking in and is struck so that he dies, there shall be no bloodguilt for him." Nowadays, if a thief breaks into your home at night, he can sue you for protecting yourself!

Let's take a trip down "police stop" memory lane and see how each country fares. While I must admit, the roads in the USSA are wide and the traffic population makes it generally safe to drive a vehicle, the number of ways the state can entrap you for cash is astronomical. Below are a few of the encounters I can roughly recall, having left the USSA over five years ago.

Checkpoint USSA

1) Not wearing a seat belt: $85.

2) Speeding on more than one occasion. Once I firmly believed it wasn't the case, but the cop wouldn't show me the radar gun. I probably would have been ticketed for daring to question his ethics: $200+.

3) Parking car in front of my home on a "snow day": $100.

Bonus: For the American who believes the government can do no wrong, how about meter maids that give out tickets before meter expiration?

Checkpoint Balkans (driving with no registration or insurance on foreign plates)

1) Stopped for having only one headlight. Pretended I didn't speak the local language: $0 (shooed away by officer).

2) Legitimately stopped for speeding at 3AM in a village in the middle of nowhere. Cops actually show me the radar gun with my speed. Cops tell me normally I'd have to pay a higher fee and go to court, but that by paying right now the problem will be solved. And by the way, the cops were "out of ticket receipts": $20.

Checkpoint Mexico (driving with no registration or insurance on foreign plates)

1) Stopped recently for no infraction, but only because of my foreign plates. Having recently purchased the (used) vehicle from another expat and due to my lack of diligence in managing some paperwork (after driving it around for more than six months), the cop harassed me for the illegal standing of my vehicle. He spoke perfect English, so I couldn't play the "stupid American" card: $75.

Permanent Tourist Tricks

Now go ahead and make your own conclusion. You can pay hundreds upon hundreds of dollars for a semblance of safety in the USSA. Or you can work out problems yourself with the authorities in the 3rd world. You can pay the corrupt policeman or you can pay the corrupt politician.

Obviously, where this crosses the line is when things become so dysfunctional simply being able to walk around safely is no longer possible, which I will admit is not the case in any of the above countries. Though you might be surprised to find that the only time I was forced to stare down the barrel of a gun was in the USSA, but that's a story for another day.

One trick you may have noticed was that in a foreign country I drive around on foreign plates. One benefit is that due to loopholes, I don't have to pay annual registration nor bother with annual vehicle checks in either the USSA or Mexico because foreign plates with expired stickers are allowed in most Mexican states. I also drive around in older used vehicles, making myself inconspicuous. This greatly lessens the chances of one being pulled over. The authorities themselves are somewhat confused on how to deal with foreigners and pay less attention to them as long as they are not outright breaking any laws. They also have a certain respect for foreigners because of their benefit to the country's economy. On the other hand, for the really corrupt authority, a foreign-plated vehicle will signal an ATM on wheels as was my case in Mexico.

A Lesson to the Resistance: Love Your Enemies

In its observance of freedom, the Dollar Vigilante is great for allowing its writers to post articles with a range of spiritual perspectives (from atheist to Christian). Some might question my perspective as a Christian, but Romans 13 simply states that believers are to submit to authority so that no one has anything at all negative to say of the believer. One can see me submitting to authority in all instances, regardless of whether the authorities are corrupt or not. Give to Caesar what is Caesar's (meaning unethical taxes) and give to God what is God's (separating state and temporal obligations from spiritual obligations). We know the IRS is a fraudulent agency and there is no income tax, but try not paying your taxes (as one Christian evangelist attempted, who is now behind bars).

Now don't get me wrong, this doesn't mean one should roll over to be steamrolled by the state. Citizens are also called to make sure the rule of law and justice are upheld and that corrupt authorities are to be confronted. However, choose your battles wisely.

Did you know that the phrase "go the extra mile" comes from one of Jesus Christ's teachings? In Roman times, soldiers could force any citizen to carry their load for them customarily for one mile. Christ was emphasizing the love of the enemy when He told people to go two miles instead. The Roman soldier would be bewildered by this show of love and not know how to react. This too can be an extremely effective approach toward disarming corrupt authorities.

I had no qualms giving the Mexican policeman what he asked for, I understood the situation as a resident of Mexico and the cost/benefit to a police stop in the USSA. However, I am getting the correct paperwork I need to ensure this won't happen again! Aside from the fine, I ended up giving my beloved corrupt Mexican policeman a million dollar bill which doubles as a Gospel tract, in hopes he might think about the error of his ways for treating me as an ATM on wheels.

You want to know the quickest way to get out of a checkpoint? A few years ago, Pastor Anderson refused to answer questions at an unconstitutional checkpoint in the USSA. The cops broke his window and the pastor was injured as the cops dragged him through the broken shards of glass. He was found not guilty in court.

In his latest checkpoint stop, he demonstrates the contrast of resisting authority to loving them, albeit somewhat sarcastically. This time around he attempts to preach to the authorities and they get rid of him faster than Emperor Barack O'Bomber can spend your paycheck!

 

Jorge Gato is The Dollar Vigilante's Mexican-based Education Correspondent and is a social sciences educator who is in the trenches daily, warding off severe cases of cognitive dissonance, mass indoctrination, and unhealthy reasoning. You can reach the dissenting professor via dissidentthinker [at] hush . com. He writes at http://dissidentthinker.wordpress.com/.

You may already know that your editor is enjoying what could be his last few weeks in the US for a long, long time. I'm trying my best to keep my nose and other body parts clean and most of all avoid the armed, uniformed local gang members that roam my city. My blood runs cold every time I see them. How easily they could ruin my remaining time here. And with their especially officious brand of evil, they don't have the deceny to be corrupt. I'd much rather slip them a hundred if they stop me and be on my way than get caught up in their legal system!

And these low IQ praetorians are being outfitted with more and more military hardware...even as their ranks fill with the kind of unempathic ape who spent his early adulthood shoving around civilians in occupied Middle Eastern countries. What sane person wouldn't be eyeing the exits?

If you're thinking about escaping the USSA for another country (and admit it, you really should be), but worry about finding real boots-on-the-ground experience in the countries that have made your short list...then look no further than TDV Groups. The Groups are a resource we provide to subscribers to TDV's Weekly Dispatch. Each group is led by a TDV Concierge who is a well-connected expert resident in a given non-US locale. They can provide invaluable information and contacts to those thinking of moving to their region. The board discussions are private, but you can join them...and get a world of hard-to-find information and direct experience...by signing up for our newsletter here

And if you are thinking of expatriation from the USSA or the declining Western World (and admit it, you really shoud be), then you may want to explore the option of a second passport in a much friendlier tax farm. Someplace in South America, for example. We can help there, too

Comments (6)

ArgusVonBlargus's picture

Personally, I find it better to derive my personal philsophy from the latest research in neuroscience, biology and technology -- a data-informed life. Others may find equal happiness from a dependence on a redacted, re-translated ancient document and that's fine. Your mileage may vary.
But, you need to study the Bible with eyes wide open in terms of how the canon was formed. The gospels of Jesus were almost certainly not written by eyewitnesses. Scholars have reached a more-or-less majority consensus that Mark was written in the 70s CE (40 years after Jesus' death), Matthew and Luke in the 80s (based largely on Markan material) and John in the 90s-120s. Scholars agree that the historical Paul probably wrote about half of the epistles attributed to him.
It may be convenient to claim "Jesus said thus-and-so" about a modern issue but please realize we don't really have any certainty about what Jesus may have said. We know what people wrote about him well after the fact. Remember, religions evolve over time, reflecting the zeitgeist of the times. Take "Thus-saith-the-Lord" with a grain of salt and allow the facts of reality to be the final arbiter of your beliefs.
 
Note: I highly recommend the works of New Testament scholar Bart Ehrman.

Another Joe's picture

Kent, you're confusing Rom 13 with Jesus' comments about rendering to Caesar what is Caesar's. Two different concepts from two different books of the New Testement.

Romans 13 says to obey the authorities, in so much as doing so doesn't necessitate sin, in an effort to protect your testimony before man. And, of course, much that the "authorities" demand is unconstitutional. There're more important things in life than getting caught up fighting the praetorians though. No sense going to jail for something stupid like failure to pay taxes or refusal to pay a ticket. Jorge's article points out that he's chosen to leave and avoid the police state rather than conform to its dictates though. I'd like to join him.

Well spoken Jorge. Thanks for you candor and effort to work through the issues at hand and remain true to your principles.

Kent McManigal's picture

Yes, I got sloppy in my comment due to not taking my time.  Of course, the "rendering unto Caesar" thing is different from Romans 13, and I do know that, but both are equally disgusting in the way statist Christians have used them to justify the unjustifiable.  Just two sides of the same counterfeit coin.
And, I agree that you do what you have to do to avoid being murdered by the State's thugs, but it still doesn't mean you owe them anything but contempt- you just do what you feel you must when the gun is pointed at your head or your kid's head.

Kent McManigal's picture

You might enjoy my recent article: I hate cops.
And, of course, as an atheist I think you are misinterpreting Romans 13 just the way the puppeticians hope you will.  Nothing is Caesar's except what he actually owns, so you owe him nothing other than not robbing him.  Your property doesn't belong to him.  Plus, I have seen Christians point out that in America, the Constitution is the authority, not those people who violate it.

Dissident Thinker's picture

I would disagree with your interpretation of Romans 13.
 
If you live in a Roman dictatorship and you are a "tax slave" as Jeff Berwick puts it, regardless of ethics (it's a dictatorship), you owe Caesar taxes.
 
If you use Federal Reserve notes, well, then give to the Federal Reserve what is the Federal Reserves. If you don't use them (i.e. gold and silver), well, how does the Fed know how much metal you got buried in a field?
 
If Jesus meant for political revolution, then why when Pilate told him to defend himself with the angels did he refuse? Because his kingdom is a spirtual one, not of this world, and the point of his coming is to save us from spiritual damnation and not political damnation.
 
There have always been dicatorships and there always will be until the end of time, do you think that we can change that? The historical record testifies otherwise. We should fight for freedom, but we can't expect it to be any different from the past cycle of Dictatorship>Revolution>Freedom>Apathy>Dictatorship...
 
One thing non-believers might overlook is that this life is short and just a breeze in the wind, so ultimately politics is of little import compared to eternity. The whole point of Jesus's coming was that we are sinners before a holy God with nothing to offer in recompense. I remember as a teen working at a grocery store helping unload a customer's heavy load of groceries into his shining Mercedes, which was part of the job description. The guy gave me a quarter and I was offended at his handing me such a pittance, I would rather have taken nothing, I was helping him for free.
 
This is the same thing when man tries to offer some "good works" to God, we are corrupt and have nothing to offer so God is offended. Christ completed the legal transaction, payment for our sins, so those accepting him could make it across the "River Styx" into heaven and not Hades.
 
http://www.gty.org/resources/bible-qna/BQ072512/christians-and-submittin...
 
It's not wholly a simple answer. Yes, I am saying that legally the US Constitution is the authority and not those who violate it. Yes, citizens should, where they can, stand up for justice, freedom and liberty. However, for believers, this is not a primary objective.
 
For somebody who is not a Christian, then this earth is all there is and of course they will be focused on making a "heaven" on earth. For those who believe in an eternal heaven, they are then making preparation for that and "storing up treasures in heaven".
 
P.S. Gospel in a nutshell, are you a good person?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCSUKIhjevo

Another Joe's picture

You articulate your thoughts well Jorge. Thanks for the thoughtful, and accurate, reply.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
back to top