the dollar vigilante blog

Fried by the Volt

 

[The following post is by Redmond Weissenberger, Managing Editor of the Dollar Vigilante and Director of the Mises institute of Canada]

A government that sets out to abolish market prices is inevitably driven toward the abolition of private property; it has to recognize that there is no middle way between the system of private property in the means of production combined with free contract, and the system of common ownership of the means of production, or socialism. It is gradually forced toward compulsory production, universal obligation to labor, rationing of consumption, and, finally, official regulation of the whole of production and consumption.

Ludwig von Mises, Theory of Money and Credit

The wholesale socialization and subsequent destruction of the US economy continues apace. The most recent example of the massive malinvestment brought on by the Federal leviathan is the saga of the Chevy Volt.

GM recently decided to suspend production of the volt due to declining sales - they have also stopped releasing sales projections. From AP:

A GM spokesman said Friday that the company will shut down production of the Volt from March 19 until April 23, idling 1,300 workers at the Detroit-Hamtramck assembly plant.

General Motors was once the Jewel in the crown of American Capitalism. By many, it was considered the greatest manufacturing company in America, if not the world. The company was destroyed by the insidious nature of the Neo-National Socialism that has infected the USA for well on 80 years now, when the merger of state and corporate power that swept across Europe was aped first by Hoover and then by FDR in the disastrous New Deal. The unions that were encouraged to eat away at GM from the inside were bailed out and the US Federal government took a 25% ownership in company. In the 2009 deal to “restructure” GM, the bondholders were wiped out, and the Unions were given a free pass to continue their destructive behaviors.

Built by what is now a de facto state-owned corporation, the Volt was the child of the green-washed brains of the Obama administration. The Volt was built for no-one, but a vision of the perfect, “New eco-Socialist Man”. Who is buying the Volt? According to Bill Visnic, senior editor of Edmunds.com, "The Volt appeals to an affluent, progressive demographic” General Motors itself stated that the average income of a Volt buyer is $175,000 a year. This trend does of course line up with the type of individual who has been at the forefront of the environmental movement since day one. A rarefied elite, righteously indignant, statist in nature, ready to have the government force eco-correct behavior on all who inhabit the land. The classic example is Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, who once opined that “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation”.

The Volt is a very good example of what happens when the means of production falls into the hands of the State. The system of profit and loss that can only operate when prices are set by the private owners of the materials and the means of production. The Chevy Volt can only exist within the sphere of the state wherein there is no rational economic calculation possible. From Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth by Ludwig von Mises:

Hence, in a socialist state wherein the pursuit of economic calculation is impossible, there can be--in our sense of the term--no economy whatsoever. In trivial and secondary matters rational conduct might still be possible, but in general it would be impossible to speak of rational production any more. There would be no means of determining what was rational, and hence it is obvious that production could never be directed by economic considerations.

When taking a look at the resources that have been poured into the Volt, one can only come to the conclusion that there was no rational economic calculation present. It is estimated by Tom Gantert that the Volt has received up to $3 Billion in Local, State and Federal Subsidies. And if you believe that GM has indeed sold 6,000 Volts, then the total subsidy per car can be estimated anywhere from $50,000 to $250,000. All of this for a mid-sized 4 door sedan that retails for $39,828 (eligible for a $7,500 federal rebate of course).

Compare that with TATA motors Nano, a four door wonder built in India with a sticker price of just under $3,000 USD for the base model. Without the hampering effects of state intervention and government backed unions monopolizing the labor pool, it is amazing what can be profitable. It’s a wonder the car doesn’t explode into flames.

If you have an understanding of the necessity of private property, and the market based, wealth generating price system that accompanies it, one shouldn’t be surprised that the Volt is such a massive failure. Even after the clear example of the failed crusade of abolishing private property for half of the world’s population during the 20th century yielded nothing but starvation and death on a genocidal scale, there are still some who claim that “Socialism hasn’t been tried” or “free markets can’t allocate resources”. Of course if we take an honest look at the test cases provided by history, it is clear where the truth lies.

THE GERMAN TEST CASE

At the end of the Second World War, Germany was split into two halves – the eastern half ruled by the Soviet Union was known as the GDR or German Democratic Republic, and the western half was occupied by France, the UK and USA and known as the FRG or Federal Republic of Germany.

In East Germany Socialism and the abolition of private property and central planning of the economy for the allocation of resources was instituted. According to Jacob G. Hornburger, in Western Germany:

The Allied occupation officials imposed an extensive set of price controls on the German economy. When Ludwig Erhard, the free-market leader of Germany, asked the officials to lift the controls in order to relieve the economic plight of the German people, they refused, claiming that an immediate lifting of controls would produce chaos. One Sunday morning, to the surprise of everyone, Erhard issued a public announcement lifting the controls. It was that action, more than anything else, that led to what became known as the German “economic miracle.

The German government of the day threw off the yoke of price controls and opened the doors for innovation and capital accumulation.

MERCEDES VS. TRABANT

Two populations, similar in composition, were subjected to two different economic systems, private property and free market prices vs. state ownership of the means of production. The results of this 40 year experiment were quite clear – in 1988, West Germany was producing the best cars in the world and East Germany was producing the Trabant, a car that literally melted away.

The USSA has been accelerating down the road of serfdom for more than 80 years now, and the incremental destruction of private property and the rule of law. The USSA is gradually forcing compulsory production, universal obligation to labor, rationing of consumption, and, finally, official regulation of the whole of production and consumption. The Volt is only a symptom of the socialist cancer at the core of Washington D.C. and welfare/warfare state that is has spawned. Is the Volt a vision of the future? Or a sign of the coming collapse of the system?

Redmond Weissenberger is the Managing Editor of the Dollar Vigilante and TDV Golden Trader. He is also the Founder and director of the Ludwig von Mises Institute of Canada. www.mises.ca

Comments (13)

private jet london's picture

MERCEDES VS. TRABANT - FRG and GDR - same time, amazing difference. I think this two little images are worth half of hald of several thousand words. That is truly illustrative.

Jeff Berwick's picture

Hi Mark, Redmond HereHilarious response, are you an employee of GM or a partisan democrat?Just a little bit short on facts... Specific facts, Guess you didn't bother to read it, or click thru the links.http://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/16192The Volt subsidies flow through multiple companies involved in production. The analysis includes adding up the amount of government subsidies via tax credits and direct funding for not only General Motors, but other companies supplying parts for the vehicle. For example, the Department of Energy awarded a $105.9 million grant to the GM Brownstown plant that assembles the batteries. The company was also awarded approximately $106 million for its Hamtramck assembly plant in state credits to retain jobs. The company that supplies the Volt

Mark's picture

Just a little bit short on facts... Specific facts, like how the volt has anything to do with the sermon in your blog. Not that I disagree with the sermon, but exactly how does a car, designed years before the bailout, given the production green light a year before Obama even gets into office, somehow become his idea? It isn't... He is just using it as a set piece to distract guys like you. Obama is trying to revamp the US energy policy, but has so far failed to get anything past congress. Even the $7500 us tax credit for EVs is a hold over from bush. This is the real issue that you should be worried about, the energy policy that is driving us into foreign dependency and bankruptcy.

Jeff Berwick's picture

Gas should be about $0.50/liter or even less. Right now in Canada 50%+ of the cost of a liter of gas is taxes.In Europe the taxes are double that and people still drive. Cars are great. Humans will always need something to amplify their strength.

mava's picture

There is a short post by Reisman (http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig3/reisman6.html ), showing that at $3.50 (when that was the case) the gas was exactly 10 cents a gallon in terms of non-inflated money. He has a longer explanation showing how the price of gas had actually fallen, had it been not for taxes and inflation, completely in agreement with an idea that capitalism makes resources more, not less available.I had a long conversation with an American-born friend, in which he was asserting that it were the illegal mexicans, that had screwed up the America. I tried, unsuccessfully, to explain that in fact they are a blessing, as without them, the economy would have collapsed already due to massive extraction of purchasing power by the Federal Reserve.If these workers are bad for us, it is only in the way that their existence allows the FED to easily mask the dollar devaluation by the substitution of goods and services that these workers provide for what otherwise would not be available to obtain for a devalued currency.

Jeff Berwick's picture

this is Redmond BTW - sorry have to create a separate login."For a New Liberty" - Written in 1973.Model T Ford, the first mass-market affordable car, 1908.I don't see anything wrong with my history.If it was 1850, I would have a horse and buggy, as it is 2011, I have a car. There were millions of Horses and buggies in the 19th century, was this due to the government subsidy of the "H&B industry"? No.I myself, prefer to get around using my own power. My ideal living environment is one where I can survive without the need for driving a car every time I need to run an errand or go see a friend.As do I, I live in downtown Toronto, where everything is walkable.I still own a car: 2 kids, Winter and the reality that I might want to go more than 5KM and have it take less 30 minutes to an hour.Cars are great liberators as well - personal mobility is a wonderful thing.Go to any country where the government doesn't subsidize roads the way the USA does, and you'll still find cars, trucks and buses.They stopped using pack animals as well.Nice Le Corbusier quote, yeah he was a socialist through and through.

mava's picture

Vince,I guess we have misunderstood each other. I would readily agree that we do not know what kind of transportation we would have, had it not been for the state intervention. Jeff says there are cars in the countries without state intervention into automobile aspect. May-be. I would say that there are automobiles in those places, true, but this could as well be a spillover effect of the intervention in other states. This, I think could be easily proven by looking at various spillovers left all over "Soviet bloc", that were the result of interventions of soviet state inside ussr. For a short instance, Chinese provinces bordering USSR had a lot of tool steel, which they themselves did not produce. This was because the industry was heavily subsidized in USSR, and thus the economy had an obvious oversupply of poorly made tools produced from high quality steel. This, obviously diffused it's way to neighboring states, in particular, China and Turkey, where that was valued higher.In no way I support ANY subsidies or intervention, - saying this just in case this is not clear about my position. Unlike Jefferson, I would not ever agree to do an evil act like subsidizing the fascist road. I don't know hoe Jefferson could do that. Seriously? So we had no men to respect? Not even Jefferson? If anyone, Jefferson should have known how evil that is, and how it goes against anything that could be called civilized and humane, more importantly, how that would be anti-freedom.And as for Le Corbusier, I have no idea who that is. I trust you that he was a fascist. However, fascists too, (and even especially so) are prone to mistakes. Just because he thought that the proliferation of the automobile would be good for the keynesian state, doesn't mean that such proliferation is necessarily a result of his ideas nor does it immediately proves that the state intervention was the decisive factor. We simply don't know. It is good to burn rubber and gas to get to work, because this means that you are adding stored energy into your gross output. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that, and when we done burning the earth resources, we should be ready to start burning those of neighboring planets.I have no problem with people liking to walk, bike, whatever. I too, like to bicycle (currently, thinking of a hammer/montague foldable bike). But, I like the freedom that the automobile gets me, and the power too. I can't think of a life where I wouldn't be able to step on a pedal and hear tires scream and smoke, feel the torque tilt, touch the warm hood. I don't care what gas cost. Should it be $20 a gallon, I'll still have it, but likely, the freeways going to be less congested. And, I never liked any cars that are not reasonably heavy. Smart cars are just not for me. On the other hand, I am thinking of ultralight. What a fun that must be (in a free country that actually lets you fly).

Vince's picture

Jeff and Mava, Y'all make some good points though you're somewhat off on your history. I draw your attention to Rothbard's "For a New Liberty":"It is now widely recognized, for example, that federal and state governments, spurred by the lobbying of automobile companies, tire companies, and construction contractors and unions, have indulged in a vast over-expansion of highways. The highways grant gross subsidies to the user and have played the major role in killing railroads as a viable enterprise. Thus, trucks can operate on a right-of-way constructed and maintained by the taxpayer, while railroads had to build and maintain their own trackage. Furthermore, the subsidized highway and road programs let to an over-expansion of automobile-using suburbs, the coerced bulldozing of countless homes and businesses, and an artificial burdening of the central cities. The cost to the taxpayer and to the economy has been enormous."The rest of his section on streets and roads is well-worth revisiting.My argument is not anti-automobile. It's anti-subsidization of automobile infrastructure. I don't begrudge your desire to drive. I just don't want to be forced to subsidize this desire. The first interstate highway underwritten by the U.S. government was the Cumberland Road (aka the National Road) begun in 1811 after having been reluctantly authorized during Jefferson

mava's picture

Cannot agree with you, Vince.What other means of transportation are you talking about? Private aircrafts, helicopters, spacecrafts? Hell yes, I want those! Buses, trains, horses, motorized bikes? Nope, thank you very much.BTW, with all the shock that I have experienced moving to America (thinking that it is a capitalist country with gold money) and finding out what it really is, I am still counting my freedom to never ever setting foot in any of communal transportation systems as one of the greatest benefits I have received as a result, and I am genuinely happy to drive my own car.As for the freeways, they were built by the government to create employment, back in the 1950-ies, but this is not the fault of an automobile. The freeways would be much more extensive and efficient now if they were private, that is, if this country still allowed private property, which it does not.Let me repeat, there is no private property in United States. I know, we are accustomed to think that there is, but it is not true. In USSR, we all were told to repeat and learn by heart that we are living in the most free country on earth, - and it was a huge lie. Same here. Just because we are told something, doesn't make it true.The fact that the government can take anyone's property for any reason, be it land or income, tells you in no uncertain terms that there is no private property on anything in US.

Jeff Berwick's picture

Sorry Vince, the Automobile was a product of private sector innovation, and it has vastly improved the quality of life for humanity.Until gas powered delivery trucks were put into wide use, the main mover of goods were horses, and if you think cars are polluters, wait till you have 1 million horses shitting, peeing and dying on the streets of NYC or London, England.Roads, especially in North America, were largely private until the government decided to monopolize them.From Tom DiLorenzo http://mises.org/daily/3446Meanwhile, private capital markets and the private "turnpike" industry were busy financing thousands of miles of private roads without any governmental assistance. When government did intervene in early-American road building, it was a financial catastrophe almost everywhere, so much so that by 1860 only Missouri and Massachusetts had not amended their state constitutions to prohibit the use of tax dollars for "internal improvements."The Interstate highway system, the "Fascism" that you are referring to, was not enacted until 1958. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_Highway_SystemThe Interstate Highway System was authorized by the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956[8]

mava's picture

Jay,No way! You're absolutely right. I would not buy anything GM makes, unless, of course, they just lose money when you buy. For instance, if they made a car with solid gold parts, and were selling it for the price of scrap plastic. Other than that, no matter what they make, I will always remember that they are stealing my money and would not give them a penny.Actually, with me this is how it was even before they have become Government Motors. This is because of the vicious and violent unions that they foster. There is no way I'd buy form a union, unless my purchase actually hurts them.When my local grocery store chain in So Cal "Ralphs" had a dispute with union, I would try to buy as much as I could from the Ralphs, going right through the picket lines of violent union thugs. Unfortunately, the owners did not happen to have a moral foundations, and eventually caved in to unions. So, now I try not to shop at Ralphs at all.BY all the rules of the game, the GM should not exist anymore, they should have been bankrupt and liquidated. Now, the fact that they are still out there, testifies that someone has been hurt by GM. The guy who would have bought their assets from an auction was clearly hurt by GM continuing to exist illegally.This is not fair at all to all those businesses competing with GM, who had played by the rules. There is only one way to make this right. No matter what happens, no matter how successful GM is to become, it must be liquidated.

Vince's picture

"General Motors was once the Jewel in the crown of American Capitalism. By many, it was considered the greatest manufacturing company in America, if not the world."Do we libertarians have a blind spot when it comes to cars? Cars are not of much use without roads, which are generally built by governments. Would GM ever have arisen to be the "jewel in the crown of American Capitalism" or "the greatest manufacturing company in America, if not the world" if it weren't for the government developed "hardware" upon which the crony capitalist GM's software (i.e. cars and trucks) could operate? What if the American military weren't around to secure the oil pipelines from which the fuel used to power these automobiles is derived? Would gas prices be so low?"Brave New World" was published 80 years ago. In it Aldous Huxley described a society where the central government maintained stability and happiness by encouraging mass consumption. Among the principle items it conditioned people to consume was automobile transportation. Wake up to the fascist transportation system that favors the automobile over all other forms of travel.

Jay's picture

Great post. GM is already shaping up to be the new poster child for government mismanagement of "private" business--displacing the perpetually money-losing Amtrak. As a long time car enthusiast this hits closer to home for me. Not many have spoken about the screaming conflict of interest when the same govt. that owns the car company is the same entity that regulates it and its competitors. I can't understand how anyone would buy GM even if they accidentally made a decent car.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
back to top