meet the vigilantes
the dollar vigilante blog
Feedback Friday - June 8th, 2012
Share this article on:

We have some great letters and comments from our readers this week, so lets get right into it.

OIL AND THE PETRODOLLAR
IN RESPONSE TO: "Jeff Berwick - Cambridge House Live - June 2012"
Dear Jeff,
It would be great if you could elaborate on something mentioned in your video interview.
Since the US dollar is required by a 1970s OPEC/US agreement to be used for the majority of crude oil volume purchases, and this agreement essentially put into place a mandate for 150+ privately owned central banks worldwide to hold US dollars (some 60% of all central bank reserves) in order for governments to buy oil from the Middle East (really, Saudi Arabia) -- how is this agreement going away anytime soon? This agreement ensures US dollar stability regardless of its dilution, in order to purchase worldwide infrastructure and commodities by central banking factions.
I realize the "media" has been reporting that Iran is challenging the petrodollar status. Iraq tried to do so. Same goes for Russia. But the oil volumes appear to be too low for these to have much impact, so my guess is that these news articles are propaganda designed to ultimately place blame on a US dollar collapse, when the central bankers are ready to pull the rug out on the American middle class.
Thoughts?
From a fan
Jeff's Response:
Thanks for your question. That is an interesting way of looking at what is going on... but in my opinion, it is a backward way of looking at it. It would be like saying Joe brutally beats his wife everyday but since they agreed in a marriage contract years ago to stay together for eternity that nothing can or will change and Joe can and will beat his wife into eternity. What I mean is, a contract is just a piece of paper. And many of these contracts always fall along the wayside as economics kicks in, just look at Bretton Woods. Not to mention, as well these are contracts signed by something that doesn't actually exist (government) makes it even less of a valid document. (For more on why government doesn't exist see this video by Stefan Molyneux). We often get fooled by the people with guns who purport to govern us into thinking any of these things are real but, in reality, they are not.
Now, that aside, even if you believe all of these entities are real and this agreement signed in the 1970s has validity, it still does not ensure that the US dollar will continue to be used for petroleum transactions. In fact, the writing has never been clearer on the wall that it won't. The criminals in the US Government have certainly been fighting that day off for as long as possible, however. Saddam Hussein stated in 2000 that he would begin to accept euros in payment for oil (Slime Magazine: Saddam Turns His Back on Greenbacks). Less than 2.5 years later and Donald Rumsfeld was shock and aweing women and children in Iraq into radiated hamburger. Moammar Gaddafi was pushing forward heavily on a single African currency made from gold - something that would have brought prosperity, finally, to Africa. Soon after, Killary Clinton cackled as he was hunted down like a dog on video, sodomized with a pipe and brutally murdered. And, earlier this year, Iran stated they would accept gold for oil, further spurring the war drums out of Washington.
Certainly, anything they are fighting this hard against must be very important to them. And, it is. The usage of the US dollar for oil is one of the last remaining reasons most countries even bother holding them. And, the actions of the US Government to demand the compliance of others with force has made some believe that it is the might of the US military killing machine that will keep the US dollar forever alive. But, that is highly, highly unlikely... and not to mention extremely depressing if you believe that the US military will force us at gunpoint to use their currency forever. But, it's not going to happen. The numbers just don't add up. The reason the dollar hasn't already entered into hyperinflation is because of its use globally. But you cannot force a planet of 7 billion people to use a dying currency by force. And, as the dollar continues to collapse it will not be possible to even buy fuel for the world's largest user of oil (the US military) to power its aggression.
That's why The End Of The Monetary System As We Know It (TEOTMSAWKI) is such a positive thing for humanity. It will almost certainly bring down the US Government (as we know it) and its military with it and give mankind a chance for peace and prosperity that hasn''t been possible since the invention of nation states and central banks. The main problem is how we get from here to there. It's going to be the biggest event in human history. Are you preparing for it?

A PLAN FOR THE FUTURE
Hi,
I have an awesome idea. Let's throw all of the Obama boys in prison along with the scum bags and throw the no good f***ed up weasel politicians in prison. Throw the parents in prison that abuse their children. Throw the goons in prison that operate Wall Street and throw the whole congress in prison along with ACORN and BP and Haliburton and the gangs and crooks and thieves and liars and cheaters. Throw the Republicans in prison along with the Democrats and then us Americans can rebuild the whole system from the ground up from the very start and start with brand new people and fresh faces to rebuild our republic. Just think, doing away with governments would save us millions of tax dollars and then governments cant bully us or push us around no more. I'm for no more governments at all. I'm a liberal and damn proud of it and we need someone that can be a real United States president that can be a commander in chief period. Thanks.
Anonymous
TDV's Response:
While we have a feeling this reader was writing under the influence he brings up some points worth discussing. First of all, notice almost everything he said is something "we" need to do. If he had replaced "let's" and "we" with "I will" and "I" he'd have been stating something worthwhile. Here's the thing... there is no "we" or "us", there is just "you" and "me". Dropping the collective words from your vocabulary can help clarify your thinking progress.
What he is stating is actually just another form of statism where we, the collective, need to throw people he deems bad in cages. Now, while he did an excellent job of fingering the true culprits for most of the problems in our world today it is still not morally correct to just go around and put people in cages. And, neither is it necessary. All that is necessary for all of the problems described above to go away is for you to ignore them. If enough people ignored Obama and the politicians and if enough people stopped paying the extortion they demand then they would fade off into the night. Obomber would have to go back to community organizing, whatever that is. And, companies like Haliburton would be bankrupt as the teet to which they suckle runs dry.
And if you live amongst people who believe in violence and theft (what the government does) then you have two choices. You can try to enlighten them... or you can leave. Or you can try to do both, as we have. The answer does not lie in prisons, new people in government or a new president. The answers lie in you looking in the mirror and making change in your own life.

A TALE OF AWAKENING
Jeff,
All of my life something has always felt "not quite right". People are always so eager to tell me what is best for me. Obey the law. Work hard. Pay your taxes. And i hate it, so I started searching around the web when i stumbled onto your site and it was like i took the red pill. The government is the machine that can never be controlled. It harvests our energy through taxes, and we are so eager to give that energy up aren't we! Now that I'm out of the matrix I can never go back, and I want to give out some red pills! Jeff, I don't know how much it means to you that you woke up a dumb redneck from Georgia, but you made a difference in my life. I have a group of five friends and their families who are with me, and we will see you soon in Acapulco! We plan to build a little compound down there and live as free as we can for as long as we can, and if that fails, we will keep searching.
Rock on Jeff, and keep ragin' against the machine.
James P., Georgia, USA
Jeff's Response:
Mangos, AcapulcoThanks James! It actually does mean a lot. If it weren't for people like yourself we'd probably find something less hazardous to do than fight the statist-quo. And, if/when you do come down to Acapulco make sure to give us a call. Already many freedom-minded people have begun moving down here. Most have bought a place at AcaCondos (http://acacondos.com) or renting a suite in one of the condos (LTGPS)and it is becoming hard not to notice our ever growing group of liberty lovers as we often take over entire bars to ourselves now... including a meet-up we are doing tonight at Mangos. Send us an email at tdv@dollarvigilante.com if you'd like to come down and meet-up with fellow travellers.
COPS AND ROBBERS - IN CAHOOTS
IN RESPONSE TO: “Barbed Wire is Beautiful”
Hi Jeff,
Interesting article. Still too many of the sheeple masses back up the police. I myself think of the police as a state sanctioned gang and for good reason.
Just a few days ago a video was released, of the final moments in the life of a guy I went to school with here in Vancouver, Canada. Paul Boyd was a brilliant animation artist. I used to see his drawings on the desk I shared although he was in a different grade. He had some mental issues, but nothing worth being murdered for. But the police gang killed him, shot six times ,and then the final killshot while he is crawling towards them unarmed. The video was shot by some tourist and, big surprise, does not at all relate to the perjurous testimony of at least seven of the cops standing around. According to their testimony, Paul was progressing towards the police, swinging a bicycle chain, in threatening manner. Here is the video http://youtu.be/207_FGF3wZk or this http://youtu.be/3UyB6D_vcnA What you do see, is a one cop reach down to the ground, take the "weapon"(bicycle chain) and throw it to the side. He is now completely disarmed, and crawling. Nothing threatening, and then the kill shot. All cops kept their jobs, no charges against them of course, after they investigated themselves. Oh, but you will be happy to know the cop that shot Paul got counselling, he needed his hand held, it was his first murder so he is not used to it yet. The single best thing ever to deal with the scumbags was miniaturized CCD cameras and Youtube.
You hear these cop apologists go back to their stadard nonsense: "If you feel that way about the police, then don't call them when you are in trouble." Well I would prefer not to call them, let alone pay them. I prefer taking matters into my own hands. They are not here for me, they are out for themselves. We of course have a nice system here for the cops. Thieves are protected by the police in a nice co-dependant relationship, much like the drugs business. You are not allowed to use firearms against a thief coming to rob you or your business. If you dare use a firearm, like a jewellery store owner did not too long ago, you are charged by the police. So now thieves know that business owners won't shoot them and they know the police will take way too long to get there to stop them. Nice situation. You are also not allowed to set booby traps for burglars, because you could hurt them. I got some equipment stolen from my garage and nothing was every found. If I had been able to do what I wanted to, I would have electrified parts of the entrance. If the burglar saw a nice blue corona 20,000 volt discharge come off the door knob, how many would really want to go through that door?
But, you can't even use barbed wire in Vancouver, it's against a bylaw! Here is a quote from the bylaw "barbed wire, razor wire and electrified fences are not permitted" They even decide what you can make your fence out of. Thank you big brother for guiding me in all my choices!
I know why there are so many thieves, they are usually victims of the drug war. Which is supported by the police. It provides 80% of thier business, and provides job security since prohibition is futile.
Be sure to avoid the gunfire while you are here in Vancouver. I will be going to the investment conference. We'll see how many people show up for your talk, seems to be growing every year. Maybe there is hope for the masses.
PD, Vancouver
Jeff's Response:
Thanks PD! I did survive my stay in Vancouver... although I have to say of all the places I've been on Earth, I've never seen as many shootings or gang fights as I have in Vancouver. It just became normal to run out of a bar with your hands over your head as bullets zinged past. You have it right... the cops and the gangs/criminals have a symbiotic relationship in Vancouver (and everywhere else) and they are happy to keep things the way they are. Even last year's massive riot has but all but been proven to have been started by the cops and then allowed to escalate before they finally moved in with tear gas and billy clubs to subdue the crowd. The reason? There is no better way to get more funding for a monopolistic police force than to fail. In the private marketplace when a person or a company fails at their job they get fired. In the topsy-turvy world of government when a person or department fails they get more money. And people wonder why things never get better.

That's all for this week! If you have any questions, comments or feedback on any of our rantings please direct them to TDV@dollarvigilante.com.














Comments (4)
By the way, my previous comment comes from the perspective of a US citizen. It may well be possible to live unmolested while largely ignoring the self-declared "authorities" in other parts of the world such as Acapulco, but that is only because those people pose a much lesser danger than their current counterparts in the USA. Today, a US citizen must be mindful of the modus operandi of US organized criminals regardless what part of the world he lives in, lest he fall prey to their hungry jaws (a particularly unique characteristic unprecedented in the history of police states, afaik).
As always, excellent commentary from Jeff Berwick and the rest of the fine folks at TDV!There is one thing in particular worth noting, though. One reader whose head is clearly spinning expresses a desire to force his fellow human beings into captivity, in order to "do away with government", yet then "rebuild the republic", stating that s/he is "for no governments at all", yet lamenting the "need" for a "real commander in chief". In response, the folks at TDV correctly point out that this reader is coming from a deeply collectivist perspective, as evidenced by the use of the words "we", "us" and "let's" [and the fact that all of this reader's solutions would require collective action to actualize] - but then proceed to advance a solution that is equally collectivist.The solution put forward by the TDV respondent(s) starts out by saying, "All that is necessary for all of the problems described above to go away is for you to ignore them", but then qualifies this assertion by stating, "If enough people ignored Obama and the politicians and if enough people stopped paying the extortion they demand then they would fade off into the night." Indeed. Only problem, this is an appeal to collective action. To be clear: Any solution that would work oh so well, but only "if enough people did it" is a collectivist pipedream. On the one hand, anytime such a dream actualizes, the effect of one's own efforts upon the outcome was but miniscule; the dream would have actualized without any input from oneself. On the other hand, most such dreams fail to actualize, leaving those laboring under this illusion with nothing to show for a lifetime of sacrifices toward collective action that never actualizes - except for bitter disappointment and blind rage. This is the miserable lot of so many libertarians bent under the merciless burden of the seductive but illusory
some..critic/correction to seemingly "Elitist-Thought-Paths" [Quote:`The answers lie in you looking in the mirror and making change in your own life`]..yes yes..Whom hasn`t heard that be4..but if U count the majority Pals/Ppl, in fact even in USA are/living as = Poor..i.e has No Resources to Move to 4ex Acapulco( hardly axross their Street) less Buy something U greatly get share of..lol..as..sure Ur knowledge is Vast but only THEORETICAL=BOOKish ..has No validity to Common Folks Circumstances..lol.. a Regular Pal Don`t even read!!..brainwashed as he/her is from MotherMilk to Tabu`s & Myths of/to Consolidated "Correct" Structure by Rothschild Penned Western Societes..lol..it`s easy to sit on "green bush/branch" of so call the"Secured Existence" & deliver/dispatch "Well-meaning-Wisdoms" .. mark well ..these are mainly 4 category of/to People Who have "already made their $tuff" .. i.e in the Capitalistic Environment = "done with = Exploit/Usurp the Most Contributing Part =(the "Feet-Folk") for Your Re-generating Gain/Profit to Max" Ps.. When Will Canadians/N-Americans LEARN the Wisdom of/about SelfCritics..?..Ciao 4now &..piu..poi ..;-)
Hi Jeff,In response to my earlier post (thanks, by the way), you wrote: "(A dollar crash) will almost certainly bring down the US Government (as we know it) and its military with it and give mankind a chance for peace and prosperity that hasn''t been possible since the invention of nation states and central banks. The main problem is how we get from here to there."Since you posted part 1 (of 2) of an article recently about UN Agenda 21 on your web site, I assume you are aware of how someone might construe your answer as suggesting you are in support of UN Agenda 21, which is backed by central bankers. Adding to this that you identify yourself as an "anarchist," when some Fabian varieties of central banker socialism also align themselves with anarchists, it has the potential to create confusion within fans such as myself.UN Agenda 21 also seems to highly anticipate the (intentional, not accidental) slow-motion collapse of the US dollar, for the purpose of transferring wealth from a "free" and politically powerful American middle class to developing nations, or perhaps central bankers and then developing nations, in that order. It is the Fabian socialist strategy to do this in slow motion for the purpose of not arising much suspicion on the part of a gullible and drugged (fluoride, etc.) US population.The World Bank and IMF, as well as China, have been suggesting for some time that the US dollar needs to be replaced as a world reserve currency. I noticed you did not mention this in your response, for some reason. The slow hyperinflation of the US dollar seems to be carefully tempered with deflationary pressures in order to control which elements of the economy hyperinflate. IMO, the intended goal is to keep this illusion going until the time is politically ripe for pulling the legs out from the US dollar and moving US middle class wealth elsewhere. This will help usher in the world communitarianism the central bankers seek, as clearly outlined in UN Agenda 21.So, if you would, please clarify your relationship as a self-proclaimed anarchist to the already-documented central banker agenda, Are you in favor of central banker-backed communitarianism (a cross between capitalism and communism), or are you not? How does your definition of anarchy fit into this?On another note: If the US dollar is being manipulated by such private organizations as the PPT and the BIS's FSB, and precious metals prices are being manipulated in terms of US dollars, does it then make sense to buy and sell precious metals in other currencies, other than the US dollar? If so, which ones would work best? Do you have graphs to show gold in relation to US dollars but also other currencies, to demonstrate the relative manipulation across currencies?
Post new comment