@ Mathew and ChrisHere you go: I'm Happy to Help. This is one of my favorite video which attempts to explain the 9/11 bullshit in less than five minutes. I hope you find as much enjoyment and by the way "facts" within it as I have. Seriously this video as funny as it is, is based on the "facts" of the events...so without further a-do...away we go...http://youtu.be/iz0_EWfdEGg

I have spent a lot of my life using explosives in the mining industry professionally. While I have never actually used them for controlled demolition, it is something that I have studied, have always had a strong interest in, and I have a collection of videos of such controlled demolitions. I can't help but try to visualize how I would place explosives, and control cables in a building to bring it down neatly whenever I see a large building under construction.I happened to be in Hong Kong and watched 911 unfold live on TV. I watched those firefighters heading into the building and I said to my friends that they were all almost certainly going to die. It seemed obvious to a blind man that those buildings were going to collapse. It was a matter of when, not if. Nobody else around me thought so, but I was the only one with any degree of professional knowledge on such things. Steel frame buildings are very vulnerable to fire, if it gets hot enough, and the insulation is stripped off. Steel doesn't have to melt, it just has to get hot. Then it deforms very easily.With thousands of tons of weight supported on those damaged and heated pillars that had been stripped of thier insulation, with thousands of gallons of fuel burning, it was just a matter of them starting to buckle, then the whole lot would pull itself down by its own weight. Once started, each floor would get pounded into the one below it in a chain reaction. Impossible to stop.Both towers collapsed pretty much like I thought they would, and I told all around me that they would. I felt powerless in not being able to warn them from my observation point on the other side of the world. A timber frame house is MUCH safer in a fire than a steel frame house because a steel frame house of basically the same design will collapse very quickly when it gets hot, but wood will take a long time to char the timbers deep enough to cause a collapse. That is just the nature of steel!! You would have much more time to escape from the wood house under similar circumstances.Regarding planes........ Planes are incredibly fragile. Sure they will cartwheel around and break up into big chunks when hitting water or a runway at the wrong angle. But if you fly one straight into a cliff, or a building, it will disintegrate and dissapear into the void without showing any signs in the tail section that anything is happening in the front. There is nothing "Magic" in the fact that the tail end of the plane appeard to still be in perfect configuration as the front was dissapearing into the building. This is what you would expect under the circumstances.A paper plane is many times stronger than a scale model of an airliner the same size. The only parts that are likely to punch right through the building are the engines and landing gear, and that is exactly what happened, at least to one engine.Such large chunks could easily rip doors off vehicles 7 blocks away.Also regarding planes. If I understand it correctly, the B25 bomber that crashed into the Empire State Building didn't crash straight into it, but hit it at an angle, with the wing hitting first, and the plane cartwheeling into the side of the building. Sure it ripped a very large hole in the side of the building, but it didn't expend all its energy on the internal structure of the building, or spill thousands of gallons of burning fuel into the building. Most of the plane crashed into the streets below. Also, if I am not mistaken, (Somebody please correct me if I am wrong.) the Empire state building is made of reinforced concrete, as opposed to the steel frame that the WTC was built from. If the steel beams in the WTC were all encased in concrete like the Empore State Building, the internal steel wouldn't have been so exposed to the intense heat from any fire. So, the comparison between the two scenarios is not valid.Whether or not 911 was planned by the US government or not is a mystery to me. Personally, I don't think so, however, with the likes of Dick Chenney and George Bush in the whitehouse, it must have been a godsend for them, and allowed them to quickly implement the so called "Patriot" act, and all the other repressive measures that they have inflicted on the American (And the rest of the world for that matter.) people.Both of these people, along with a large number of their cohorts, shoule be tried as war criminals. Line them up against a wall I say!!!!However, that does not mean that they planned and instigated the attack. It seem possible, and plausable to me that they may have had prior inklings of something in the works, but I doubt that it was actually planned and instigated by them. Like all tyranically minded psychopaths, they just saw an opportunity to grab more power, and make even more squillions in defence contracts, and took it, and ran with it as hard as they could.This gave them the means to use the politics and psychology of fear to turn the USA into the USSA, and have the sheeple actually support them, even while their rights were being stripped away!!!!! 911 must have been a dream come true for them!!!!There is no need for conspiracy theories to explain what happened at the time, and afterwards. With leaders like Dick Chenney and George Bush in the whitehouse, who needs to conjure up a villain????I reckon Bin Laden, or some similarly screwed up people of the same ilke, just managed to pull off an amazingly brazen and successful attack. I am sure their success went beyond their wildest dreams.But the real criminals are still the US administration for they way they have used it as an excuse to whip up mindless paranoia among the people, get rid of the bill of rights, (More or less.) and grab more power.This is what people should be marching in the streets about. Not half baked conspiracy theories.Best Regards,Russell.

Actually, I was born to be a slave, not a free man. No secret there. I just was never afraid to acknowledge what is true. If I could change my thinking, so can you.

I gave up--years ago--trying to show people the evidence that the 'official' story of 911 was horseshit.For most, the idea that the 'official' explanation of events could be a cover-up or just plain wrong isn't even a possibility. Most Americans have been so completely brainwashed into authority-worship that facts which contradict the 'official' story of 911 are useless.They'll call you a "conspiracy nut", a "Truther", an "anti-govt. extremist", etc., but they NEVER address some of the inconvenient facts like those listed on this blog. I had several friends and family members flat-out tell me they didn't want to hear about any evidence that might upset them and shake their naive belief in the 'official' story. Insane, huh?Its impossible to say exactly WHO the perpetrators were or HOW the 911 false-flag attacks were pulled off, but such a mountain of contradictory evidence exists that only the truly self-deluded (most Americans, sadly) can still cling to their 911 Mythology.Its funny how the Self-Deluders who defend the 'official' story put a ridiculously impossible-to-produce-burden-of-proof on 'Truthers'. They believe that, unless 'Truthers' can show EXACTLY who did it and how, all of the gross inconsistencies (and flat-out IMPOSSIBILITIES) contained w/i the 'official' explanation are irrelevant. Insanity.Self-Deluders have the ridiculous idea that the ENTIRE USGovt. would have to have been in on the 'conspiracy' when, in reality, relatively few w/i the secretive and unaccountable intelligence/espionage agencies (which have connections w/other govt's agencies, like Israel's Mossad) and a few coordinating players placed in key positions of power and influence (Cheney as VP, Rumsfeld as Sec. of Def., WTC-owner Larry Silverstein, etc.) exerting control over obedient/loyal operatives would need to be in on the operation. Do the Self-Deluders REALLY believe a few psychopaths and followers w/access to the vast powers of the USGovt's military/espionage apparatus aren't capable of blowing up a few measly buildings? Get real! Those DBA "The USGovt" have murdered MILLIONS of people and destroyed TRILLION$ worth of property to advance their own aims! Self-Deluders ask, "How could the govt. pull off such an enormous operation right in front of the world w/o being caught?" Ahhhh, it wasn't "the govt', it was a small cabal of individuals working in coordination for probably different but complimentary ends and they DIDN'T pull it off w/o anyone realizing it; Self-Deluders simply refuse to acknowledge the assertions of those who've poked a bunch of holes in the 911 Myth. The conspirators knew they could count on Self-Deluders and the opinion-shapers and PC Police w/i the MSM playing along w/the Big Lie and re-inforcing it by defending the 'official' version...THATS how they were able to pull it off in broad daylight in front of everyone.How long would one's career and/or credibility in academia, the media, govt., engineering, etc. last if one came out and questioned the 'official' story? Most accept the Big Lie because to do otherwise would mean ostracism, ridicule, and contemplating a truth too awful for most to bear. It would shake too many people's faith in their religion (Authority/State Worship). It is Y'ALL, Self-Deluders, who have been the biggest group of co-conspirators...YOU who have enabled the Big Lie to go largely unchallenged.

"Then, my friend, you are born to be a slave."Don't expect too many converts with that kind of pompous attitude. Lol, who says sh-t like that? First work on putting together a semi-coherent logical case. Then everyone will decide if this grandiose Born Free mantle you've assumed is appropriate.

Fun with 9/11 video:Watch the collapse of the towers. Focus on pieces falling down. Note the trail of dust behind them. Now, follow their fall all the way, and watch in awe, that the whole piece disappears into it's own dust trail! That's magic.Experiment: Ask anyone to throw say, a bucket with dust from a building, and watch it fall. Yet, there will be trail of dust. But, first, the piece (say, a bucket) can never disappear in it's own trail of dust, as it is always ahead of it. Second, eventually the dust trail ends, and then there is only a piece itself falling through the air. This is reality.Fun with 9/11 video:When a plane enters the tower, there is no destruction of the plane as it is going through the steel facing of the tower. You can view it frame by frame, and when the engines are already inside, the tail section of the plane is still in perfect configuration. Magic.Watch any plane collision with anything, but especially the water. Water is hard, but not as hard as steel. Watch how as soon as the plane touches the water, the rest of the plane starts to rotate and disintegrate. This is because the inertia of the various plane parts is greater than the force that keeps them in place. This is why in a head on car collisions, the driver is thrown through the windshield forward, - his body inertia is greater than whatever holds him in the seat. Same with anything you may have loaded in the truck bed, even if attached. If it is heavy enough, it will move forward, breaking it's own attachments. Same with trains, we see how other cars react to a collision way ahead of them. This is reality.

Dear Gary,Concerning the piece,Dear Slavery,interesting theory. However, the B-52 bomber was not introduced until the early 50ths. Also, I am not aware of any large millitary air plane, like a bomber, ever crashing into the Empire State Building. You might end up with an credibility issue making statements like that.

I found this documentary very compelling: 'The third truth'. It's a bit of a sit, but makes some convincing pointshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOZLZRocDKsHow could e.g. an identified woman stand in the gaping hole caused by the plane, that would cause temperatures to go so high as to weaken steel, but apparently, a human being had no problem to stand there.Also the pulverization of the buildings, the molten steel, the collapse of WT7, the cancer cases among the first responders. The height to which the pulverization extended. The recorded pre collapse vibration of the towers. The name of the event 'ground zero'.

It is all in the mindset. Do you have a slave mindset?When the IRS sends you an audit notice, because they "think" they need to examine your records, you comply? What happens when you refuse? Does the IRS say "Oh, he must be innocent then, obviously he must have very strong reasons not to show us any documents"?When we tell the government that we want to see all the video supposedly captured, that has all the imagery of all the plains, and they refuse, you say? "They must have a good reason"? Then, my friend, you are born to be a slave. You are innately predisposed to be a slave. You always assume your own moral inferiority from the get go.For the rest of us, the question of figuring it out is that of self-amusement. That the government is guilty is very clear, and it follows from the fact that they are unable to present the evidence to the opposite.